RTE Factual – purveyors of the absurd
Because I am a masochist, I stuck on RTE One last night, you know, to see how my licence fee was being spent. And I got a forceful reminder of how bad an idea that was in the form of two movements from the bowels of RTE Factual department.
First up – the Frontline, an avant garde faux-current affairs programme that uses the format of a day-time talk show to probe the pressing issues of the day with typically hilarious results. It’s presented by “Pat Kenny”, a monochrome computer-generated approximation of a human being whose heartbreakingly inept attempts to emote and empathise with real humans provides the comedic core of the show.
Last night’s topic was The Family. The panel featured Ivana Bacik, whose terrifying Ovaries and Dublin Liberalism took the combined bigotry of two male religious haters of The Gay to balance out.
Gay hater number one was David Quinn, director of the Iona Institute, a Catholic think-tank that “promotes the place of marriage and religion in society”, that place being in your bedroom making sure you don’t do anything icky that that the Pope wouldn’t like. Quinn is a clever Pope-agandist and knows that the only thing liberals love more than The Gay is Evidence and all that stuff that god-botherers usually have no time for. So he was all about vague American studies that prove that kids do best if brought up in a family with a married mother and father who confine their carnal lusts to Jesus-approved sex acts. One of the studies was a study of studies (and so brimming with proofiness) by Childfriends, a “left leaning” American organisation so authoritative that even the Google can’t find it (though it’s possible that David Quinn’s idea of evidence for the excellence of godly parenting falls under the same category as his idea of evidence for god and that you have to believe really, really hard to see it).
Gay hater number two, Jim Walsh, a Fianna Fail senator (challenging Fine Gael’s lock on loony religious legislators), was entirely more traditional in his approach, eschewing liberal “evidence” for some good old-time crazy. The Civil Partnership Bill, along with the EU and UN, with their insistence on “human rights” and “equality” would lead to a “Totalitarian State” where civil servants could not exercise their god-given freedom to discriminate against citizens that they their god didn’t approve of. Discriminating against discriminators is discrimination squared, doncha see! Just to prove the point, poor Jim was then brutally oppressed by a lady former Supreme Court Justice who pointed out that giving officers of the state the right to discriminate against citizens based on personal prejudices might be a Bad Thing. This is nonsense, since every decent Christian knows that discrimination (esp. against The Gay) is not only Goodly, but Godly.
To round off the routine, “Pat Kenny” showed his remarkable verisimilitude to a real human being by attempting a bad analogy. He compared the herd immunity provided by vaccination to the “protection” that the existence of traditional married heterosexual families provide to the unfortunate spawn of other types of family. OMG – so if there’s not enough traditional families in the herd – we might all get the Gay-pox! Why do you want us to get the Gay-pox, Ivana Bacik? Why? WHY?
An ogre in the audience suggested that this was all part of the Gay Agenda, which seemed to excite him to a point not seen since he watched that episode of the Riordans where Benjy and yer wan were cavorting on the beach in Ballybunion.
The Gay Agenda, of course, wants to destroy heterosexuality by granting unmarried and same sex couples the same rights and freedoms enjoyed by married, heterosexual couples. Marriage is only good if it’s exclusive, you see. Without special incentives, men and women will no longer feel the God-Given, “Anthropological” and Wholly Natural desire to get a document from the state that legally codifies their relationship and magically transforms them into the most ideal type of parents possible. Why bother with procreation (ew!) when you can have sodomy and the Wizard of Oz 24/7?
The Frontline was a hard act to follow, but RTE Factual weren’t done yet. Their next offering of the evening was “If Lynch had Invaded”, a fascinating documentary exploring what might have happened if documentaries were shot by autistic 12 year olds with attention-deficit disorder and mobile phones.
The precocious filmmakers got most of their footage by stalking Keelin Shanley, an RTE “personality”, pursuing her relentlessly around the back streets of Dublin and London. In a series of queasily sensual scenes, the camera slewed drunkenly in and out of focus, crash-zooming into unsettling close ups of Shanley’s mouth as she purred the narration over her shoulder while desperately fleeing the tirelessly roving eye of her pursuers. There was also a retired army man driving around Newry in a Land Rover, talking about how hard the Irish army would have been fucked by the British if we’d crossed the Border in 1969, but he was boring. The camera only had eyes for Keelin, on the fleeting occasions it could get her simultaneously in focus and in frame.
“If Lynch had Invaded” was a daring and innovative piece of post modernism that was not afraid to present the viewer with absurd contradiction – RTE Factual filming an unwatchable television programme predicated entirely on a fictional event. Genius.











